Vol. 72 No. 2 (2026): Ethics and regulation of artificial intelligence
Articles

SELF-CONTROL AND SUGGESTIBILITY IN THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Dulvis Mejía
Investigador
Juan Julio Fuente
Universidad Nacional Pedro Henriquez Ureña
Bio
Julianny Castro
Universidad Nacional Pedro Henriquez Ureña
Bio

Published 2026-07-06 — Updated on 2026-07-06

Keywords

  • sugestionabilidad,
  • Inteligencia artificial,
  • autocontrol

How to Cite

Mejía, D., Fuente, J. J. ., & Castro, J. . (2026). SELF-CONTROL AND SUGGESTIBILITY IN THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. AULA Revista De Humanidades Y Ciencias Sociales, 72(2). https://doi.org/10.33413/aulahcs.2026.72i2.478

Abstract

The increasing presence of artificial intelligence (AI) in daily life raises concerns about its influence on human decision-making, particularly among people who interact frequently with digital systems. Grounded in self-control, this study aimed to explore the level of self-control required to protect individuals from AI-related suggestibility. A quantitative, non-experimental, correlational design was used with a sample of 134 participants aged 18 to 60. The Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS-9), the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS), and IA-specific interaction and suggestibility items were administered. Results revealed a negative association between self-control and both general and AI-related suggestibility, indicating that stronger regulatory abilities support resistance to algorithmic persuasion. Impulse control and self-discipline accounted for 36.1% of suggestibility variance, while longer AI usage time was associated with greater IA susceptibility. Sociodemographic variables such as age, education level, and gender did not significantly predict AI suggestibility. Findings suggest that self-control functions as a key psychological buffer against algorithmic influence and that vulnerability to AI depends more on internal regulatory mechanisms than on technological experience or demographic traits. These results highlight the need to strengthen self-control and critical thinking skills to promote safer and more autonomous interaction with intelligent systems.

References

  1. Angelucci, L. (2025, August 6). (PDF) Escala de sugestionabilidad interrogativa de Gudjonsson: confiabilidad, análisis de ítems y estructura factorial. ResearchGate. Retrieved September 21, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28298868_Escala_de_sugestionabilidad_interrogativa_de_Gudjonsson_confiabilidad_analisis_de_items_y_estructura_factorial
  2. Aydin, Y. (2025, July 23). "Think First, Verify Always": Training Humans to Face AI Risks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03714
  3. Baumeister, & Tierney. (2011). La Fuerza de Voluntad. American Psychological Association. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from https://www.apa.org/topics/willpower-spanish.pdf.
  4. Cherryman, J. (2003). La psicología de los interrogatorios y las confesiones: un manual. GH Gudjonsson. https://research.ebsco.com/c/6pw7z2/search/details/lzejtfh2vf?db=asn%2Cagr%2Caps%2Casu%2Cbsu%2Cb7h%2Cufh%2Cddh%2Ce000xww%2Cnlebk%2Ce086sww%2Ceue%2Cegs%2Cent%2Ceih%2Ceric%2Cfap%2C8gh%2Chjh%2Chsi%2Clgs%2Clls%2Clth%2Cmdl%2Cddu%2Cpbh%2Cbwh%2Csxi&limiters=None&
  5. Council, J. R. (2005). Personalidad, psicopatología y sugestionabilidad hipnótica. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77808904
  6. Destéfano, M., & Velázquez, F. (2018). Teorías de doble proceso: ¿una arquitectura de procesos múltiples? https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3397/339755051004/html/
  7. Irving, J. A., & Nikolova, N. (2024). La relación entre la transliminalidad, la sugestibilidad hipnótica e imaginativa y otros rasgos de personalidad. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824000027?via%3Dihub
  8. Pfundmair, M., Stöger, L. M., & Steffens, C. (2023). Ostracism and suggestibility: how temporary cognitive deficits drive suggestibility after ostracism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370864759_Ostracism_and_suggestibility_how_temporary_cognitive_deficits_drive_suggestibility_after_ostracism
  9. Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., & Bongard, N. (2019). Machine behaviour. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1138-y
  10. Reddy, R. (2005). The Origins of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). https://research.ebsco.com/c/6pw7z2/search/details/o4d4j4kaib/details?db=asn%2Cagr%2Caps%2Casu%2Cbsu%2Cb7h%2Cufh%2Cddh%2Ce000xww%2Cnlebk%2Ce086sww%2Ceue%2Cegs%2Cent%2Ceih%2Ceric%2Cfap%2C8gh%2Chjh%2Chsi%2Clgs%2Clls%2Clth%2Cmdl%2Cddu%2Cpbh%2Cbwh%2Csxi&limite
  11. Rodríguez Ruiz, J., Marín López, I., & Espejo Siles, R. (2024). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382592562_Is_artificial_intelligence_use_related_to_self-control_self-esteem_and_self-efficacy_among_university_students
  12. Rubio Hernández, F. J., Díaz López, A., & Cava, V. (2024). Efecto mediador del autocontrol sobre la autoestima y el uso de Instagram en adolescentes. Relaciones con el rendimiento académico y el estrés tecnológico. https://research.ebsco.com/c/6pw7z2/search/details/de7zad3e4z?db=asn%2Cagr%2Caps%2Casu%2Cbsu%2Cb7h%2Cufh%2Cddh%2Ce000xww%2Cnlebk%2Ce086sww%2Ceue%2Cegs%2Cent%2Ceih%2Ceric%2Cfap%2C8gh%2Chjh%2Chsi%2Clgs%2Clls%2Clth%2Cmdl%2Cddu%2Cpbh%2Cbwh%2Csxi&limiters=DT1%3
  13. Russell, & Norvig. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. https://luismejias21.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/inteligencia-artificial-un-enfoque-moderno-stuart-j-russell.pdf
  14. Sabour, S., Mengyuan Liu, J., & Liu, S. (2025). Human Decision-making is Susceptible to AI-driven Manipulation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388920519_Human_Decision-making_is_Susceptible_to_AI-driven_Manipulation
  15. Shao, C., & Ciampaglia, G. L. (2018). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329218472_The_spread_of_low-credibility_content_by_social_bots