Vol. 67 No. 1 (2021): Enero - Junio | La Democracia en el s. XXI
Articles

Democracy and empathy. The space that inhabits it, its collective progression

Natasha Amelia Abad Betances, Arq.
Bio

Published 2020-12-17 — Updated on 2023-02-03

Versions

Keywords

  • citizen,
  • democracy,
  • empathy,
  • space,
  • solidarity,
  • values
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Abad Betances, N. A. (2023). Democracy and empathy. The space that inhabits it, its collective progression. AULA Revista De Humanidades Y Ciencias Sociales, 67(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.33413/aulahcs.2021.67i1.149 (Original work published December 17, 2020)

Abstract

The philosophical discussion that encompasses the democracy of the 21st century encompasses a deeper collective meaning than what the word refers to in its singular definition. Democracy is a popular doctrine / political system / form of government where the people choose. And it is in the election where approaches to an idea that tries to be collective are generated.
This article uses the feeling of empathy as a unifying feature between democracy and its search for collective awareness. In its definition, empathy is a feeling of solidarity towards a person or group (Rae, 2019). Empathy observes the relationships of the human being, is linked in communities, invests in generating the city for the common good and is an unconscious part of the development of civilization (Rifkin J. 2010). Another important concept to highlight is the space, in which the situational or in-situ development is generated. The space delimits the territory and in it the history, its culture and the time together with the sensations converge. The space acquires conditions based on needs, manifests itself as a result of these (Rifkin J. 2010) and allows, as producers resulting from experience, to recognize the place where collective development takes actions. In this article, space and place go hand in hand, being the commitment that defines the experience in geographical terms.
The following paragraphs are intended to go the one way (Piglia G. 2015) towards the understanding of democracy in a century where human values seek to be equated with spiritual transcendence and where feelings are active emotions that play in the community. Spaces where you can recognize your own and others questioners within a possible spectrum; where both parties are heard, disseminated without appropriation and linked as options. Is it possible to recognize the truth of the other as your own? Can the citizen of the XXI century observe relating fundamental values such as solidarity, honesty and listening, and define them as progressive actions for the development of society?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words [Como hacer cosas con palabras] (2nd ed). Harvard University Press.
  2. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex [La ascendencia del hombre y la selección en relación con el sexo]. John Murray.
  3. Didion, J. (2014, 22 de Octubre). On Self- Respect: Joan Didion’s 1961 Essay from the Pages of Vogue [Sobre el respeto a uno mismo: el ensayo de 1961 de Joan Didion de las páginas de Vogue]. Vogue Magazine. https://www.vogue.com/article/joan-didion-self-respect-essay-1961
  4. Johnson, E. M. (2017). Sympathy, Empathy, and the Evolution of Darwin’s Moral Sense [Simpatía, empatía y la evolución del sentido moral de Darwin]. University of British Columbia Press.
  5. Kohler, W. (1917). Intelligenzprüfungen an Anthropoiden [Pruebas de inteligencia en antropoides]. Royal Prussian Society of Sciences.
  6. Krznaric, R. (2015). Empathy: Why It Matters, and How to Get IT [Empatía: por qué es importante y cómo conseguirla]. Perigee Books.
  7. Kwok-Bun, C. (2012). Cultural Hybridity: Contradictions and Dilemmas [Hibridez cultural: contradicciones y dilemas]. Routledge.
  8. Lakoff, G. (1989). No pienses como un elefante. Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
  9. Lakoff, G. (2003). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. University of Chicago Press.
  10. Lee, H. (1988). How To Kill A Mockingbird [Cómo matar a un ruiseñor]. Grand Central Publishing.
  11. Levinas, M. (1961). Ética e Infinito. Antonio Machado.
  12. Morrell, M.E. (2010). Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation [Empatía y democracia: sentimiento, pensamiento y deliberación]. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  13. Rifkin, J. (2009). La Civilización Empática. Paidós Estado y Sociedad.
  14. Titchener, E. B. (1909). Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of the Thought-Process [Conferencias sobre la psicología experimental del proceso del pensamiento]. The MacMillan Company.
  15. Viejó Bautista, M. J. (2014). La democracia política, social y económica. Universidad de Sevilla.
  16. Whitman, W. (1855). Leaves of Grass [Hojas de hierva]. New York Review Of Books.
  17. Whitman, W. (2013). Perspectivas democráticas y otros escritos (Capitán Swing: Ensayo). Capitan Swing.