Vol. 66 No. 1 (2020): January - June Philosophy
Articles

Technological Education in Latin America: A Precondition in Social Classes

Emgelberth Vargas
Universidad Bicentenaria Aragua
Bio

Published 2020-01-07

Keywords

  • Educational Quality,
  • Technoscientific Education,
  • Social Inequality

How to Cite

Vargas, E. (2020). Technological Education in Latin America: A Precondition in Social Classes. AULA Revista De Humanidades Y Ciencias Sociales, 66(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.33413/aulahcs.2020.66i1.124

Abstract

In Latin America and the Caribbean, the 21st century is configured as the era where technological innovations cover all areas in which society develops, such as philosophy, politics, social sciences, basic sciences, among others. In this regard, technoscientific education (ETCS) is known as the set of disciplines that interact to study the social aspects of science and technology in relation to the educational field for society. In this sense, there are organizations that promote education for all as a right, as established by UNESCO, however, technoscientific education has opened the pedagogical debate by inferring that the inequality of social classes corresponds to a
precondition for their accessibility. This means that social classes could determine the success of a society applying a technological culture or not. However, it is a matter of government entities that direct a country to enforce policies that can guarantee its citizens a quality education, social equity and respect for human rights using educational perspectives, models and theories that propose education as an acquisition of interdisciplinary knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aguado, M. (2013). Diversidad e igualdad en educación. Madrid: UNED.
  2. Blanco, R. (2008). Haciendo efectivo el derecho a una educación de calidad sin exclusiones. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 54, 15-35.
  3. Blanco, R. & Cusato, S, (S/F). Desigualdades educativas en América Latina: todos somos responsables. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO.
  4. Casaban, E. (2004). El impacto social de la cultura científica y técnica. España: Ministerio de Educación.
  5. Cepal. (2016). La matriz de la desigualdad social en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
  6. Cortés, F. (2011). Desigualdad económica y poder en México. México: Cepal. Recuperado de: http://www.cepal.org/cgi-bin/getProd.asp?xml=/publicaciones/xml/9/42089/P42089.xml&xsl=/mexico/tpl/p9f.xsl&-base=/mexico/tpl/top-bottom.xsl
  7. De la Cruz, F. (2017). Igualdad y equidad en educación: retos para una América Latina en transición. Perú: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Recuperado en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_art-text&pid=S1019-94032017000200008
  8. González, M.; López, J. & Luján, J. (1996). Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad; una introducción al estudio social de la ciencia y la tecnología. Madrid, España: Tecnos.
  9. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creación de capacidades: El enfoque del desarrollo humano. Cambridge, MA: La prensa Belknap de Harvard University Press. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
  10. Pérez, J. (2000). Hacia una educación de calidad. Gestión, instrumentos y evaluación. Madrid: Narcea.
  11. UNESCO (1997). Primer Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo (PERCE). Santiago de Chile: UNESCO.